Writers, directors and producers of feature films supported with Lottery funding through the BFI Film Fund are each set to reap the rewards of the film’s success, thanks to a new deal struck by WGGB, Directors UK and Pact.
Up to a 37.5% share of BFI’s recouped income from supported film productions is put into a ‘locked box’, where it is held by the BFI and available to be drawn down for developing and producing future film projects – ensuring revenue from successful BFI-backed films is invested directly back into the British film industry, and enabling those responsible for the film’s success to create more film projects.
Working together as The Filmmakers’ Alliance, WGGB, Directors UK and Pact have agreed that the recouped income from BFI Lottery-backed productions that is held in the locked box will be split three ways, with writers, directors and producers each guaranteed a minimum share of 12.5%.
Locked-box revenue shares must be used for reinvestment in film development and production. Writers, directors and producers are free to reinvest their guaranteed share collectively or independently of each other.
The agreement takes immediate effect and will be reviewed in 2017.
The deal delivers on a pledge made by the BFI in its Film Forever five-year plan and one of the recommendations of the Film Policy Review led by Lord Chris Smith in 2013.
BFI CEO Amanda Nevill said: “Rewarding success and giving talented writers, directors and producers the creative and financial autonomy to develop and produce future projects is absolutely key to many of the plans we set out in Film Forever. I’m so pleased to see this agreement come into force and I’m looking forward to seeing exciting new projects which have been borne of success.”
The Filmmakers’ Alliance on the locked box deal
WGGB President Olivia Hetreed
“The Writers’ Guild of Great Britain is delighted to be a partner in this initiative with Directors UK and Pact. The ability to use creative success to create more funding possibilities for development, the most hard-to-fund area of film-making, is a critical step in turning a dependent film culture into a genuinely diverse and independent one. We applaud the BFI in taking up the Film Policy Review recommendation and trust that other publicly funded institutions will follow suit.”
Directors UK CEO Andrew Chowns
“This deal is important because it brings together the three key creative film-makers on every BFI Film Fund supported film production. It aligns their interests in making their film as successful as possible and ensures the success of one film can be transferred into their development and production of new works.”
Chief Executive of Pact John McVay
“This is a very beneficial way to ensure that all the key creative partners in the creation and production of British films can share in the success and reinvest the funds into new film projects or activities.”
Writer, director and WGGB member Mike Leigh received a BAFTA Fellowship at the Royal Opera House last night (8 February 2015).
Despite his Mr. Turner biopic failing to receive any nominations in the major categories at this year’s awards, presented by Stephen Fry, he said:
“We got four nominations tonight, and you BAFTA are a democratic gang and your taste is your prerogative… What is important to me is that you have awarded me this fellowship for which I am truly grateful… For me this is a sign of your respect for an offbeat, alternative, original, idiosyncratic personal kind of cinema… Pure independent cinema are the filmmakers of the future.”
The Fellowship is the highest accolade bestowed by BAFTA upon an individual in recognition of an outstanding and exceptional contribution to film, television or games.
Those previously honoured include Charlie Chaplin, Alfred Hitchcock, Steven Spielberg, Sean Connery, Elizabeth Taylor, Stanley Kubrick, Anthony Hopkins, Laurence Olivier, Judi Dench, Vanessa Redgrave, Christopher Lee, Martin Scorsese, Alan Parker and Helen Mirren.
The Edinburgh International Film Festival and Edinburgh College of Art are this week hosting the inaugural Scottish Film Summit in a response to the crisis in Scotland’s film industry. The WGGB are participating in this important event.
The summit will engage all sectors of the film industry, from producers, writers and directors, to facilities companies, location managers and crews, to film educators, archivists, trainers and academics, festivals, distributors and exhibitors. The day will have keynote speakers setting out their views on the issues the Scottish film industry should be considering. Key issues on the agenda are likely to include what needs to allow more home-grown films to be made, how to help the country attract more bid-budget films to shoot on location, and ways to reverse a talent drain of film-makers away from Scotland.
This is an opportunity to present the current views and concerns of the industry, and to look at how to build up the Scottish industry post-Referendum. The event is likely to discuss the case for a new permanent film studio in Scotland to help the country compete with existing facilities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, as well as the impact of the referendum on film-making in Scotland.
According to The Scotsman, the summit has been announced after more than nine months of lobbying from film-makers who warned the industry north of the border was on the brink of disaster because of a lack of support and financial backing from the Scottish Government and arts agency Creative Scotland.
The quango’s chief executive, Janet Archer, will be one of the keynote speakers at the summit, along with Glasgow-born film producer Iain Smith, one of the leading figures involved in an independent group set up last year to campaign for a better deal for the industry.
A damning report into the industry for Creative Scotland found the country was lagging way behind major European rivals when it comes to studio facilities and support for film-makers. It warned that the country did not have enough infrastructure in place to support a successful industry, despite the success of hit films such as The Filth and Sunshine on Leith.
Creative Scotland has won some backing from the industry for appointing its first dedicated director of film, former entertainment lawyer Natalie Usher, and agreeing to up its maximum grant for film productions by 60 per per cent, to £500,000.
The Scottish Government and Scottish Enterprise are studying a number options for the country’s first full-time film studio, with ministers ring-fencing £2 million for a loan fund to help get the venture off the ground.
Attendees to the summit will receive lunch and tickets for the EIFF Opening night film screening and party.
18 June Main Lecture Theatre,
ECA Main Building, Lauriston Place,
Read more in The Scotsman
The Writers' Guild has joined forces with The Black List to help raise the prominence of UK-based writers in the worldwide film industry. The Black List began as a survey in 2005, when American film executive Franklin Leonard surveyed almost 100 film industry development executives about their favourite scripts from that year that had not yet been made. The results were compiled and sent out to all who responded, and the process has been repeated every year ever since.
More than 225 Black List screenplays have since been made as feature films. Those films have earned over $19 billion in worldwide box-office, have been nominated for more than 175 Academy Awards, and have won 30 (including Best Pictures Slumdog Millionaire, The King’s Speech and Argo) and seven of the last 14 screenwriting Oscars.
The Black List also offers a membership site for industry professionals that functions as a real-time screenplay recommendation engine, allowing executives across the world to find the scripts that they want to make.
The Guild partnership with The Black List allows members to list their scripts on The Black List site for free, raising their profile and helping more of their films to make it into production. The Black List site will also contain information about support and resources available for Guild members.
'Great stories have no borders and the ability to access them shouldn’t either. We’re thrilled that this alliance with the WGGB will allow us to further make that the case,' said Black List founder Franklin Leonard.
As part of the newly formed alliance between the Writers Guild of America West and the Black List, all WGGB members will be able to add their script titles, loglines, tags and representative information, as well as monitor their work’s ratings and user traffic, free of charge. They will also receive a 20% discount on paid Black List services to host their scripts and obtain reader evaluations of their screenplays.
Since its launch, the Black List’s script-hosting website has been responsible for dozens of writers finding representation with major agencies and management companies, as well as more than a dozen script sales.
Visit The Black List website
Creative England is launching a series of talks, masterclasses, networking events and talent showcase for emerging filmmakers at the Lighthouse, in Brighton.
Open to any Southern based writer / director / producer yet to make their first film who would benefit from attending those events – in particular our overview module covering the filmmaking process from development to distribution.
All the details are to be found here:http://www.creativeengland.co.uk/index.php/brighton-talent-centre-programme/
To apply, send a CV and a Cover Letter (deadline is 28th March) - all are welcome no matter where they are based. The module is completely free, and the aim is to help the next generation of British filmmakers work together rather than in isolation.
Open letter calls for recognition for writers
Writers' Guild President Olivia Hetreed has written an open letter to the Guardian calling on it to recognise the work of writers in their new film awards. The letter, also signed by Andrea Gibb amd Line Langebek (Co-Chairs of the WGGB Film Committee), comes after Guild member Lisa Holdsworth identified the omission earlier this week.
The letter is reproduced below:
The Writers’ Guild was delighted to read that the Guardian had decided to launch its own film awards, particularly as they seem to be offered in a spirit of fun and celebration, aimed at engaging readers with film. However, we are dismayed at the decision to leave out the names of the screenwriters who actually wrote the material in the Best Scene and Best Line Of Dialogue categories. It seems perverse to recognise and applaud screenwriting yet ignore writers.
We've been in touch with one of your reviewers, who explained that the writers’ names 'just didn’t seem like crucial information at the longlist or blog stage.' The reviewer also pointed out that the Guardian has not credited the nominated marketing teams either. This seems a somewhat bizarre justification: does she really mean to equate the marketing campaign and the film script?
We appreciate that this is an attempt to engage your readers but fail to understand how adding the names of the writers would prevent this process. Guardian readers seem highly knowledgeable about film and deserve better information than being given an actor's name alongside a line of dialogue. Film is a supremely collaborative medium and while it may not suit the word count of film reviewers to acknowledge this, there seems no reason for the Guardian Awards to compound their error.
It is hardly difficult to find the names of the short-listed writers. They are as follows:
BEST SCENE: Peter Baynam, Steve Coogan, Neil Gibbons, Rob Gibbons, Armando Ianucci; Alfonso Cuaron, Jonas Cuaron; Paolo Sorrentino, Umberto Contarello; John Ridley; Woody Allen; Richard Linklater, Julie Delpy, Ethan Hawke; Carlos Reygadas; Abdellatif Kechiche, Ghalia Lacroix; Terence Winter.
BEST LINE OF DIALOGUE: Joel Coen, Ethan Coen; Bob Nelson; Eric Warren Singer, David O.Russell; John Ridley; Woody Allen; Bob Nelson; Jeff Pope, Steve Coogan; Paolo Sorrentino, Umberto Contarello; Christopher Ford; Spike Jonze.
The most disheartening thing about this omission and your reviewer’s response to our query is that it is part of a much larger problem, whereby the media consistently and carelessly attribute the work of writers to directors and actors, thereby misinforming their audience. What a shame that the Guardian’s attempt to do something “new and innovative” should fall prey to such old fashioned, lazy or ignorant thinking.
Andrea Gibb & Line Langebek
Co-Chairs, WGGB Film Committee
New survey published by the Federation of Screenwriters in Europe (FSE)
The Federation of Screenwriters in Europe has published a survey of European screenwriters' income in 2012.
The survey was undertaken to inform a series of workshops for screenwriters’ guilds in European countries entitled Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining in the Digital Economy. The online survey, asking seven questions, was distributed by 21 European screenwriters’ guilds belonging to the FSE (including the Writers' Guild of Great Britain).
Seven hundred professional screenwriters for both TV and film in over 25 countries responded and provided information about their income in 2012. The anonymous survey provides factual information to illuminate the discussion about authors remuneration.
Download the survey (pdf)
British screenwriter Tim John on making the move to Hollywood
I’d read plenty of books about how to write Hollywood screenplays, but never found one that also described what living there would be like. So I decided to write one. Adventures In LaLa Land chronicles the seven years I spent riding the rollercoaster.
How does real life compare to reel life? Do the stars create more drama off-screen than on? Is the local social network really full of desperate housewives? How do writers find work?
My main reason for going to Hollywood was that I had always loved films, so wanted to be right at the heart of the industry. The tricky thing was knowing when to go. Given the colossal gamble the film business is, it's hardly the sort of move you want to risk when you have young children and a bank manager to support, as I did. Having said that, in some ways the choice was made for me because I was ‘let go’ from my job as a London copywriter when the agency was taken over by another group. Everyone who, like me, was part-time, was let go. What a strange phrase ‘let go’, it implies you'd been chomping at the bit, bursting to break free.
Deborah Espect on writing and making her award-winning short film, Dog Day
Bella Emberg in Dog Day (Copyright Georgie Angless)
I love writing because it allows me to dwell in a solitary comfort zone. But I’ve never studied how to write, so I’ve never learnt about structure; and when I start a new project I don’t have a plan. Sometimes I picture a character and a situation they end up in; then a scene develops and from there I have a story. I go on a journey with the characters and, like them, I don’t know what comes next almost until it happens. Sometimes the journey doesn’t work, or the character gets stuck and I have to start again. I encounter this quite a lot when writing plays.
Dog Day was going to be a completely different film to what it is now. I had just watched London To Brighton and Fish Tank, and I really wanted to write about a real woman in today’s England. This in itself was nothing new or original, but so much has already been written about everything that, for me, it’s always been more about what I do with an idea than the idea itself.
Dog Day was going to see our protagonist, a 30-something woman, take her young children to the zoo. There wouldn’t have been much dialogue, other than when she’d tell her kids off for trying to jump off a fence to touch an animal, or when she’d have to explain that the toys they wanted in the souvenir shop were too expensive. The lack of words would have represented her relentless solitude. But I wasn’t particularly confident with that set up.
The thought of working with children was rather daunting for someone as inexperienced in the film industry as me, and shooting in a zoo presented all sorts of logistical problems. So, instead, I decided that my 30-something woman would be visiting her mum in Brighton, on her 70th birthday. Again, the script didn’t contain much dialogue, because the two women just didn’t know how to communicate with each other. Instead, there were a lot of awkward silences and frustrated faces.
Tracy Brabin reports on the launch of the BFI Statistical Yearbook
Facts&Stats – the BFI launch the Statistical Yearbook 2013
Statistics, love them or hate them, they’re the only thing that gives any argument validity, but on a hot and muggy day it was with a heavy heart I entered the BFI. Will the room be full of statistical gonks and geeks? I needn’t have worried. After a couple of quips on the Royal Birth; ‘this baby (the report) weighs in at 205 pages after a 7 month labour,’ Sean Perkins got underway with the difficult job of translating his department’s analysis into easy to digest numbers for non-numerates like me.
Some figures were extremely positive. UK cinema admissions were the third highest of the last 40 years, up at 647 releases. Revenues were at an all time high with ‘Skyfall’ setting a new Box Office record at £103 million, followed by independent films ‘The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel’ and ‘The Woman in Black’, all in a market worth £4billion.
UK writers also proved a draw to audiences; only 5% of films released during the year were adapted from UK story material but accounted for 23% of the total box office. These films were based on characters first written in 1937 (The Hobbit), 1958 (Bond) and 1983 (Woman in Black), a clear reminder of the enduring economic value of British cultural excellence.
We also discovered that the cinema-going audience is ageing and there was a rise of the over 45’s buying tickets, up from 14% in 1977 to 36% in 2012, with Simon Beaufoy’s ‘Salmon Fishing in the Yemen’ topping the viewing chart.
Clive Dawson on finding favour in Hollywood with his feature film script Last Days On Mars
Liev Schreiber in Last Days On Mars, adapted by Clive Dawson from the book by Sydney J Bounds
If it’s something you aspire to, rest assured that no matter what stage you’re at in your career it’s never too late to have a crack at Hollywood. It goes without saying that you’ll need a little talent, preferably some kind of track record, and a great deal of good fortune. Above all else, you’ll need a good sample script. Getting through the doors in the first place is the hard part; the rest is relatively straightforward. There’s no set way to go about it, but here’s the approach that worked (more through luck than judgement) for me.
Until its cancellation I was a regular writer on TV series The Bill, and had been for many years. I enjoyed writing for the show, particularly in its earlier incarnation of half-hour, stand-alone single dramas, but towards the end it became clear to many of the writers that the show was unlikely to survive; ITV had tampered with the format to the point of destruction. I’d written for other shows over the years but had never found another ‘home’ and, despite constant submissions and occasional development deals here and there, my original series and single drama ideas never seemed to find favour with the network heads. In short, my screen credits were limited, and once The Bill was axed my prospects in TV didn’t look good.
Fortunately, I’d never entirely given up on the hope of working in film. I’d had an original screenplay (a World War II psychological thriller entitled The Bunker) produced many years previously. Although I all but disowned the director’s turgid film version the screen credit itself was welcome and my screenplay continued to prove a well-received writing sample. Nevertheless a subsequent film project, funded by the UK Film Council, ended up in legal limbo due to the collapse of the production company, and my long-standing agent gradually seemed to lose interest in promoting me. Now, with my regular TV work gone, it was time to either sink or swim.
Against this backdrop, I decided to risk a little of my own money obtaining an option on a published short story, The Animators, by the prolific British author Sydney J Bounds. It’s an extremely creepy 11-page science-fiction thriller that I first read in an anthology many years ago, and I’d always felt it could form the basis of an effective film. A series of internet searches and emails to publishers finally led me to Philip Harbottle, the agent representing the estate of Syd Bounds. My initial query was polite and simple: were the rights to the story available, and if so, would it be possible to negotiate an option? To my amazement, the answer to both questions was yes. Phil was extremely accommodating and we eventually agreed an option for an initial sum, against a larger additional payment if the project went into fully-funded development.
At the Edinburgh Film Festival this weekend, Andrew Walsh, Treasurer of the Writers' Guild, spoke at a lively panel session on writing for multi-platform media - Thinking Outside the Page: Expanding Models of Storytelling (pictured, above).
Fellow panellists were Phil Parker, founder of the legendary MA Screenwriting at LCP, and now launching a website www.bcre8ive.eu, where all kinds of creatives can meet and work together on a wide range of projects, and Olivia Hetreed, screenwriter and new President of the Guild. The panel was chaired by James Mavor, also a screenwriter and lecturer at Edinburgh Napier University.
The panellists discussed their own wide variety of working practices and range of experience from video games to television and feature films large and small and also explored with the audience the challenges and opportunities of new media and the practicalities of audience reach and financing such blue sky ventures.
Later, Olivia Hetreed was joined by Andrea Gibb, incoming co-Chair of the Film Committee and one of Scotland's most successful screenwriters, to present the findings of an international survey of film festivals, Written into the Picture. While many of the findings present a grim picture - 80% of surveyed festivals invited no or fewer than five writers as guests and over 60% do not have a Screenwriting Award - we also found that North American Festivals have a more positive attitude with two thirds inviting writers. While the statistics are shocking the survey also revealed the pressure festivals are under financially, from distributors and press and caused some festivals to reconsider their attitude to writers.
In an informal discussion with a large audience at the Traverse Bar, Andrea and Olivia considered the further action that can be taken by the Guild and by individual writers to improve the situation, including follow up surveys, awards for best practice - Edinburgh itself is one of the most writer-friendly festivals, with many events and a large number of writer delegates - with the aim of shifting perception among the festivals, press and public regarding the truth about the complex creation of a feature film.
The event was followed by a very popular networking drinks event where it was good to catch up with Guild members and especially Scottish Branch rep, Julie Ann Thomason. Scottish members should get in touch with Julie via the Guild to be part of future events.
More photos: www.facebook.com/thewritersguild
Paul Goetzee reflects on his recent trip to the Cannes Film Festival with the Maison des Scénaristes
Are you a scénariste? Or are you an auteur?
In France apparently all screenwriters are expected to be auteurs. A legacy of the anti-literary La Nouvelle Vague, Les Cahiers du Cinéma, Godard, Truffaut, Rohmer and all, no doubt. There is no such thing as a writer in film, only an auteur, which my French dictionary defines as ‘author, creator... perpetrator’ – the last one probably very apt in a lot of film-making.
However, as far as Sarah Gurévick and Nicolas Zappi, founders of the Maison des Scénaristes (the House of Screenwriters) are concerned, writers should not have to be burdened with the obligation to direct. They are screenwriters, not auteurs, creators nor indeed perpetrators.
This may sound odd to English ears. I don’t know about you, but as a screenwriter I feel I’m constantly being nagged to ‘write visually’, ‘think like a director’ and so on. In France this is a given. You think up your story, plan your film... then get behind the camera and make it.
I have to admit I do like directing as well as writing. Whether I am any good at it is another matter. I like planning the whole project from the back of the envelope to the back of beyond. I like working with actors. I like designing sets and costumes, drawing up shooting scripts and storyboards. But a lot of writers I know don’t care about directing – whether it’s a play, a film or anything else. That’s someone else’s job. Someone with more energy, skill and, well, hubris. Writers are there to come up with a good story, then tussle with and defeat all the little narrative gremlins of plot, structure and character motivation that almost always – no, always – rear their beastly little heads.
So what exactly is Maison des Scénaristes (MdS) and how did I come to take part in their event in Cannes?